Getting Familiar with Book Builder
The Process of Historical Inquiry Checklist
What do Historians Do?
Making Historical Inquiry Your Own: Choosing a Time Period and Topic
Getting an Overview and Creating your Essential Question
Gathering Sources
Working with the Sources
Digging into Visual Documents
Looking at the Details of Visual Documents
Collecting Evidence from Visual Documents
Considering Bias in Visual Documents
Evaluating Evidence from Visual Documents
Addressing the Essential Question with Visual Documents
The Preston Deposition: Digging into Written Documents and Looking at the Details
The Preston Deposition: Collecting Evidence
The Preston Deposition: Considering Bias
The Soldiers' Depositions: Digging into Written Documents, Looking at the Details and Considering Bias
Evaluating Evidence from Written Documents and First Person Accounts
Addressing the Essential Question with Written Documents and First-Person Accounts
Corroborating Facts Across Sources
Putting it all Together: Creating a Thesis Statement
Putting it All Together: Making your Report Plan
Putting it All Together: Supporting your Argument
Putting it All Together: Choosing your Project Format
What's Next?
Teaching and Learning Resources
Getting Familiar with Book Builder
Meet the Coaches
In this book, you will see coaches that ask you questions and give you ideas and models of how to approach the process of historical inquiry. Use these coaches to help you work through your own project, or to get ideas on how to work with different kinds of documents.
These coaches are guides to help you with your own historical inquiry.
Click on any of the coaches at the bottom of each page when you want ideas or suggestions for your inquiry.
Response areas
You will also notice that there is a place for you to write your responses to the prompts and questions throughout the book. Anything you type in there will be saved temporarily while you are using this book. You can click on the View My Responses button at the bottom of any page to see the work you have done today. Make sure to copy the work to a word document each day, before you leave the book.
TextHELP Text-to-Speech (TTS)
You may have already noticed that there is a TextHELP toolbar floating over your Book Builder story. This is a "Text-to-Speech" tool (also known as TTS). You can use TTS to have the computer read the page text aloud.
Watch the animation below for a demonstration of how to use TTS. Then, try out the TextHELP TTS tool by having it read this page to you.
In this book you will see words that are underlined with a dotted line . This means that the word is connected to a glossary that is built into this book. You can click on any underlined word to see its definition instantly.
Hyperlinks
Any words that you see underlined and in a bright blue color that look like a hyperlink are exactly that! I've linked some of the text to websites that I think will help you better understand the documents.
The Process of Historical Inquiry:
Choose a time period or theme
Narrow your inquiry to a specific topic or event
Do background research to get an overview
Develop your essential question
Gather your sources
Work with each source:
Corroborate the evidence across sources
Put it all together: make your argument
What do Historians Do?
Historians evaluate ideas and events that took place in the past. They investigate change over time and try to come up with explanations of why or how things happened.
The first challenge historians face is, "What should I study?"
To help with this challenge, historians first choose a time period or theme. Next, they narrow the focus down to something specific, like a particular event that took place in the past. Then, they get an overview of the event by doing some background research.
These first steps usually uncover something that gets a historian wondering---maybe it's something that doesn't seem to make sense, or some facts seem to contradict. This kind of problem leads a historian to ask questions about the topic or event. These essential questions keep a historian focused on a goal while doing historical inquiry.
____________________________
Summary:
The Process of Historical Inquiry starts with:
Making Historical Inquiry your own: Choosing a topic and time period
How do I get started?
My historical inquiry:
In the example coming up in the next few pages, the time period I’m studying is the American Revolution. My specific topic is a fight that took place in Boston on March 5, 1770--an event that later became known as the Boston Massacre. At this event, we know that British soldiers shot and killed American colonists.
My time period: American Revolution My specific topic/event: The Boston Massacre __________________________ Take Action: Start your own Historical Inquiry Use the coaches for ideas on how to get started. You can use the response area to take notes, or save your ideas in another document.
Getting an Overview and Creating your Essential Question:
What do I already know about my topic? What do I want to find out?
I want to think about what I already know about the Boston Massacre and then do some background research with a few secondary sources to see what else I can find out about my topic.
What I know already:
What I found out by doing some general reading and research:
What are some questions I have after doing this background research?
After doing my background research, something doesn't make sense to me. I know that John Adams was a well-known American patriot; even as early as 1770, Adams hated the British in Boston. Why would he be willing to defend the British soldiers? Was there something about the event that would make sense of this?
And how could the soldiers have been found innocent when they killed 5 people? Were there circumstances that could explain or justify the soldiers' actions? I'm going to use my essential question to explore these ideas and guide my research.
My Essential Question:
Why would British soldiers shoot and kill American colonists at the Boston Massacre?
_______________________________________________
Take Action:
Get an Overview and Create your Essential Question
Gathering Sources
What kinds of documents should I look at?
I want to use sources that will show me the different sides of the story. I also want to look at different kinds of sources, like paintings, testimony or diaries. I know that there is evidence for what happened in more than just printed documents!
My Sources
I have chosen three types of sources to use to help answer my question—
When you choose sources, think about including:
What other kinds of documents can you think of to investigate a historical question or problem?
_____________________________
Take Action:
Gather your sources
Choose sources that you think will tell different sides of the story or that tell the story in different ways. Be creative—images, songs or cartoons and text are all good historical sources.
Working with the Sources
How do I get information from my sources?
Now I get to dig into my sources. I will look closely at each of the documents and collect evidence. Then, I will think about the evidence I have found and how it can help me answer my essential question.
The answer to my essential question will be my thesis statement. Some historians also call this their 'argument.' When I build my historical inquiry report, I will use evidence from my sources to support my thesis statement.
__________________________________ Summary:
The Process of Historical Inquiry continues with:
Digging into Visual Docments:
What do I see in the source that helps me understand my topic?
First, I'm going to look at the poster to see how it can help me understand the event and answer my essential question, 'Why would British soldiers shoot and kill American colonists at the Boston Massacre?'
I see that this poster was "engraved, printed and sold by Paul Revere," a Boston printer and silversmith. I found out that this poster was widely distributed and seen by a lot of people very shortly after the Boston Massacre took place.
Click here for an online version of the poster. Use it to take a closer look.
What do you think?
What can a poster tell you about an event, and how does it communicate the information? Check Pedro, Hali and Monty for ideas on how to find and understand information in this kind of source.
Looking at the Details of Visual Documents:
What details in the source help me understand my topic?
I have an overview of what my document says about the Boston Massacre. Now, I want to take a closer look at the poster to see what it reveals about the author's opinion of the event.
I focus on sections of the poster that are circled to collect my evidence. Next, I'll evaluate the evidence I have collected. Then I will think about how this information addresses my essential question
Click here for an online version of the poster. You can use it to take a closer look. What do you think? ____________________________
Historical inquiry continues with:
Collecting Evidence from Visual Documents:
What information have I collected from my source?
Click here if you want to view an online version of the poster.
Evidence from the poster:
____________________________
Take Action:
Collect Evidence
Look through one of your visual sources --a poster, photograph or cartoon--and record all the things that you notice, including details and specifics from your source. You can use one of the document analysis worksheets at the links below to guide you in collecting your evidence.
Considering Bias in Visual Documents
What is the point of view of my source?
The purpose of a visual source may seem obvious; it shows what it looked like at the time the source was made, right? Not necessarily! Visual sources that seem factual may be trying to persuade or deceive the viewer, and this includes posters and photographs.
With a few questions in mind, though, I can uncover the bias of a source and still get valuable information from it. These are the questions I use when looking for a source's perspective:
Click here for an online version of the poster.
I'll use these questions to consider the bias of this source:
____________________________
Take Action:
Consider the bias of a source
When you consider the bias of a source, think about:
Evaluating the Evidence from Visual Documents:
What "story" does my source tell me about my topic?
I've collected evidence and considered the bias in my source. Now I want to step back and think about what this information says to me about the Boston Massacre. I will use the evidence from the document as the basis of my interpretation, or evaluation, of the source.
My evaluation of the poster:
The organization of the British soldiers and disorganization of the American colonists seems really important in this poster. The British soldiers are shown as an organized army, deliberately stepping forward together toward the crowd of colonists. The soldiers stand in a military formation with an officer, who seems calm and controlled, motioning forward. The Americans, in contrast, are shown as an unorganized crowd of simple people. I believe that any viewer of this poster would ask themselves, "how could this be a fair fight? How could a small bunch of disorganized colonists provoke this well-disciplined army?"
_______________________________________________
Take Action:
Evaluate your visual document
You've collected data from your visual document, now add meaning to it with your evaluation, or interpretation. Base your evaluation on the facts as well as your understanding and experience. Make sure to tie your evaluation to evidence in the document.
Addressing the Essential Question with Visual Documents
How does this source answer my essential question?
I have gathered and thought about the evidence from my source. Now I will use this evidence to answer my essential question.
My Essential Question:
Why would British soldiers shoot and kill American colonists at the Boston Massacre?
________________________________________________________
Take Action:
Discuss how the evidence addresses your essential question
Put the information you have collected and your evaluation of that evidence to work.
What do I see in the source that helps me understand my topic?
Now I get to consider trial testimony from the Boston Massacre. First-person accounts are as close as we can get to 'being there.' However, people often disagree about what they see and hear even if they are at the same event.
I'll start with the deposition (testimony that is written down and given to a court) given by Captain Preston, the officer in charge the night of the Boston Massacre, during his own trial. I highlight sections that I think are important or interesting as I read the document.
(Text Digital Source: The Boston Massacre Trials. Click on the link if you would like to read more of this deposition)
___________________________________________
It is [a] matter of too great notoriety to need any proofs that the arrival of his Majesty's troops in Boston was extremely obnoxious to its inhabitants.... One of their justices, most thoroughly acquainted with the people and their intentions, on the trial of a man of the 14th Regiment, openly and publicly in the hearing of great numbers of people and from the seat of justice, declared "that the soldiers must now take care of themselves, nor trust too much to their arms, for they were but a handful; that the inhabitants carried weapons concealed under their clothes, and would destroy them in a moment, if they pleased." This, considering the malicious temper of the people, was an alarming circumstance to the soldiery. Since which several disputes have happened between the townspeople and the soldiers of both regiments….
On the 2d instant two of the 29th going through one Gray's ropewalk, the rope-makers insultingly asked them if they would empty a vault. This unfortunately had the desired effect by provoking the soldiers, and from words they went to blows. …The insolence as well as utter hatred of the inhabitants to the troops increased daily.…
On Monday night about 8 o'clock two soldiers were attacked and beat…. About 9 [o'clock] some of the guard came to and informed me the town inhabitants were assembling to attack the troops…. In my way there I saw the people in great commotion, and heard them use the most cruel and horrid threats against the troops. In a few minutes after I reached the guard, about 100 people passed it and went towards the custom house where the king's money is lodged. They immediately surrounded the sentry posted there, and with clubs and other weapons threatened to execute their vengeance on him. …. This I feared might be a prelude to their plundering the king's chest.
I immediately sent a non-commissioned officer and 12 men to protect both the sentry and the king's money, and very soon followed myself to prevent, if possible, all disorder…. [The soldiers] soon rushed through the people, and by charging their bayonets in half-circles, kept them at a little distance. …. The mob still increased and were more outrageous, striking their clubs or bludgeons one against another, and calling out, come on you rascals, you bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare, G-d damn you, fire and be damned, we know you dare not...
They advanced to the points of the bayonets, struck some of them and even the muzzles of the pieces, and seemed to be endeavouring to close with the soldiers.… one of the soldiers having received a severe blow with a stick, stepped a little on one side and instantly fired, on which turning to and asking him why he fired without orders, I was struck with a club on my arm, which for some time deprived me of the use of it, which blow had it been placed on my head, most probably would have destroyed me.
On this a general attack was made on the men by a great number of heavy clubs and snowballs being thrown at them, by which all our lives were in imminent danger, some persons at the same time from behind calling out, damn your bloods-why don't you fire. Instantly three or four of the soldiers fired, one after another, and directly after three more in the same confusion and hurry. The mob then ran away, except three unhappy men who instantly expired …. The whole of this melancholy affair was transacted in almost 20 minutes.
What do you think?
What does this document tell you about what made the soldiers shoot the colonists? Check Pedro, Hali and Monty for ideas on how to find and understand information from this type of source.
________________________________________________________
Summary:
Historical inquiry process continues with:
Collecting Evidence: The Preston Deposition
What information have I collected from this source?
I want to record all the information in this deposition that might help me answer my essential question. I also want to note anything that just seems interesting. Who knows--the stuff that just seems interesting may turn out to be really important to my research!
Preston Deposition:
_______________________________
Take Action:
Collect evidence from your written documents
Considering Bias: The Preston Deposition
What is the point of view of my source?
This source gave me a lot of information, but how do I know what it says is true? To find out, I need to consider the bias of the source.
Just as I considered bias in the Boston Massacre poster, I ask myself these questions as I think about a written document:
Who created the document?
Is there anything I know about the person that will help me understand the bias of the source?
Where was the person during the event?
Why did the person create this document? Could this person have anything to lose or gain?
What are some key parts or words in the document that I think reveal the bias?
____________________________
Summary:
Historical inquiry process continues with:
Digging into Written Documents, Looking at the Details and Considering Bias: Depositions from John Wilme, Jeffrey Richardson, John Gray and Ebenezer Bridgham at the Soldiers' Trials
What information in my source helps me understand the topic? What is the point of view of my source?
Many people gave legal depositions when the soldiers were put on trial for the colonists' deaths. These gave me a lot of new information to think about! As I read through these depositions, I asked myself, how do these depositions help me understand what made the soldiers shoot the colonists?
I read through the depositions once. Then, I went back to dig into the detail of these documents. I used my highlighter to mark parts that I think are important for my historical inquiry.
Testimony from the trials of the British Soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre
(Digital Source: The Boston Massacre Trials Page. Click the link if you would like to read more depositions from the trials)
___________________________
1. From the deposition of John Wilme
"I, John Wilme, of lawful age, testify that about ten days before the late massacre, Christopher Rumbly of the 14th regiment, was at my house...[and]...did talk very much against the town, and said if there should be any interruption, that the grenadier's company was to march up King street...and that he had been in many a battle; and that he did not know but he might be soon in one here; and that if he was, he would level his piece so as not to miss; and said that the blood would soon run in the streets of Boston...."
Collecting Evidence: John Wilme
Considering bias:
Who created the document?
Is there anything I know about the person that will help me understand the bias of the source?
Where was the person during the event?
Why did the person create this document?
What could this person have to lose or gain?
What are some key parts or words in the document that I think reveal the bias?
2. From the deposition of Jeffrey Richardson
"I, Jeffrey Richardson, of lawful age, testify and say, that on Friday, the second instant, about 11 o'clock, A.M., eight or ten soldiers of the 29th regiment, armed with clubs, came to Mr. John Gray's ropewalks [ropemaking shop], and challenged all the ropemakers to come out and fight them... ."
Collecting Evidence: Jeffrey Richardson
Considering bias:
Who created the document?
Is there anything I know about the person that will help me understand the bias of the source?
Where was the person during the event?
Why did this person create the document?
What could this person have to lose or gain?
What are some key parts or words of the document that I think reveal the bias?
3. From the deposition of John Gray
"...this put me upon immediately waiting upon Col. Dalrymple, to whom I related what I understood had passed at the ropewalk days before. He replied it was much the same as he had heard from his people; but says he, 'your man was the aggressor in affronting one of my people, by asking him if he wanted to work, and then telling him to clean his little-house [outhouse].' For this expression I dismissed my journeyman on the Monday morning following; and further said, I would all in my power to prevent my people's giving them any affront in future. He then assured me, he had and should do everything in his power to keep his soldiers in order...."
Collecting Evidence: John Gray
Considering bias:
Who created the document?
Is there anything I know about the person that will help me understand the bias of the source?
Where was the person during the event?
Why did this person create the document?
What could this person have to lose or gain?
What are some key parts or words of the document that I think reveal the bias?
4. From the testimony of Ebenezer Bridgham
"They stood with their pieces before them, to defend themselves; and as soon as they had placed themselves, a party, about twelve in number, with sticks in their hands, who stood in the middle of the street, gave three cheers, and immediately surrounded the soldiers, and struck upon their guns with their sticks, and passed along the front of the soldiers, toward Royal-Exchange-lane, striking the soldiers' guns as they passed...I saw the people near me on the left, strike the soldiers' guns, daring them to fire, and called them cowardly rascals, for bringing arms against naked men...."
Collecting Evidence: Ebenezer Bridgham
Considering bias:
Who created the document?
Is there anything I know about the person that will help me understand the bias of the source?
Where was the person during the event?
Why did this person create the document?
What could this person have to lose or gain?
What are some key parts or words of the document that I think reveal the bias?
_______________________________________________
Take Action:
Gather your evidence
Evaluating Evidence: Written Documents and First-Person Accounts
What "story" does my source tell me about my topic?
Now that I have collected evidence from the trial depositions, I want to evaluate the sources. When I evaluate, I use the evidence in the documents, connect it to the background knowledge about the event that I’ve already learned, and use them to create my interpretation of the event.
My evaluation of the Preston deposition:
My evaluation of the John Wilme deposition:
_______________________________ Take Action: You've collected data from your first-person documents, now add meaning to them with your evaluation. A good evaluation:
My evaluation of the Jeffrey Richardson deposition:
My evaluation of the John Gray deposition:
My evaluation of the Ebenezer Bridgham deposition:
Evaluate your Evidence
Addressing the Essential Question: Written Documents and First-Person Accounts
How does this source answer my essential question?
To put this evidence to work, I need to think about how these first-person accounts help me answer my essential question:
Why would British soldiers shoot and kill American colonists at the Boston Massacre?
These first-person accounts help me fill in some of the information that I felt was missing when I looked at just the poster. The poster showed the Boston Massacre, but did not include any of the events or feelings that led up to the event. These first-person documents help explain different motivations for the actions of the British soldiers.
My thoughts:
The picture that these depositions paint, no matter which 'side' they take, is of a city that is full of tension. Many townspeople in Boston hated the British soldiers. The British soldiers hated the townspeople as well. This mutual hatred had bubbled up in the past-- in fights and other confrontations. The shooting into the crowd at the Boston Massacre seems like it was just another fight in this ongoing story of the hatred between the two groups.
____________________________
Take Action:
Use the evidence to address your essential question
Corroborating Facts Across Sources:
How do the facts and information I gathered compare across sources?
Now that I've gathered and evaluated evidence and sources, I want to corroborate some of the facts surrounding the event. Corroborating facts makes them more convincing. The more sources that corroborate a fact, the more likely it is to be true.
I want to find out if my sources agree on the facts and their opinion about the event, or if they disagree. I also want to see if the bias of the source important in shaping the information the source gives. Some facts emerged that seem especially important to my inquiry. These facts, and how each source addressed them helps me corroborate information about the event.
Listing the facts:
The some facts were:
I also want to connect how the documents considered these facts in light of the bias I already uncovered. To do this, I used a table to organize my data, corroborate the facts and help me see the 'big picture.'
Comparing facts across sources:
(to enlarge the page and see the table in more detail, press 'Ctrl' and '+' at the same time)
Now I have a much clearer idea of what each document says and what its bias is. I'm ready to put the pieces of my inquiry together and take the next step: putting the evidence to work for my essential question.
____________________________
Take Action:
Corroborate information across sources
Putting it All Together: Creating your Thesis Statement
How do I synthesize all this information into an argument?
My thesis statement is my answer to my essential question. It is based on the evidence, my analysis and the facts I corroborated from my sources. My thesis statement can be one sentence, or a few sentences. What is important is that my thesis statement clearly states my argument, and that I can support my argument with evidence and my evaluation of the sources.
My Essential Question: Why would British soldiers shoot and kill American colonists at the Boston Massacre?
My Thesis Statement: Although Bostonians tried to depict themselves as innocent victims of British tyranny, long-simmering tensions between the townspeople of Boston and the soldiers themselves led almost unavoidably to the event that came to be known as the Boston Massacre. Bostonians were resentful of the British soldiers stationed in their town. The soldiers were bitter at the abuse and isolation they faced every day from the townspeople. The tension between these two groups resulted in a series of fights and disputes between the townpeople and soldiers, of which the Boston Massacre was just one incident.
____________________________
Take Action:
Create your thesis statement. For ideas and a tool to help you get started on your thesis statement, go to the Persuasive Essay Thesis Builder website.
Putting it All Together: Making your Report Plan
How do I share the ideas and opinions I have about my topic?
My historical inquiry is only done when I've organized and reported my findings. To help me organize my ideas, evidence, and the flow of my argument, I always create an outline of my report plan.
My outline can be a rough 'sketch' of what I plan to write, or it can be detailed and list the different types of evidence I will use to support each section. I know I may change the outline as I go through the process of writing and revising my report, but what is most important is that my outline gives me my overall plan.
Each section of my outline is a section of my argument. Each section has a central topic, which I will support with evidence and explanation. Added together, all the sections will support my thesis statement.
I've done my outline in two ways: one using a graphic organizer and another using a written outline. You can do your outline in the way that helps you best in planning how you will write up your research. Draw, audio record, write notes--do what helps you stay focused on your research goal!
An example of my plan, in a graphic organizer:
An example of my plan, in a written outline:
I. Local colonists depicted themselves as innocent victims of British tyranny
II. There was a long history of tensions between the people and soldiers in Boston
III. The people of Boston resented the British soldiers presence
IV. The British soldiers were resentful of the people of Boston
V. The tensions between the groups led to the soldiers shooting into the crowd of townspeople
VI. Conclusion
___________________________
Take Action:
Create your report plan
Putting it All Together: Supporting your Argument
How do I make my argument more convincing?
Since my thesis is the answer to my essential question, I want to make it convincing by supporting it with evidence from my sources. Evidence doesn't always speak for itself, though. I need to explain how each piece of evidence supports my thesis.
Below is an example of what I do to strenghten my argument to make it more convincing. I wrote the topic sentence of my first paragraph and notes to myself to remind me of information I need to fill in to support my argument.
_________________________
First paragraph topic sentence:
The local colonists depicted themselves as the innocent victims of British tyranny
Another example that shows that the local colonists depicted themselves as the innocent victims of British tyranny is...
___________________________
Take Action:
Support your argument
Support each part of your argument with evidence and explanation. If you need some help, use the Persuasive Essay Thesis Builder to generate your project outline. It includes prompts to remind you to support your argument with evidence and evaluation.
Putting it All Together: Choosing your Project Format
How do I choose the best format to present my argument?
I have a lot of choices for how to present my argument; I can do an essay, make a poster, create a PowerPoint presentation, or make a podcast. Whichever format I choose, I want it to be the one that lets me show my argument in the most convincing form.
I decided to report my inquiry findings in a PowerPoint presentation. I know I am a convincing speaker and I think that the images that I found, combined with the written evidence, my analysis, and explanation will create an interesting and convincing report.
Each slide of my PowerPoint will be a section of my argument. Added together, all the sections will support my thesis statement. To make sure I've done a great job, I'll use a Research Project rubric to self-check my presentation before I turn it in.
_____________________________
Take Action:
Choose your project format
Your historical inquiry report can be presented in many different ways. Pick the one that you think will best present your argument and help convince your audience. A written essay, PowerPoint, or poster presentation are all good ways to present your findings. What other ways can you think of to present your work?
What's Next?
Well, I've finished my inquiry on the Boston Massacre. You may come to a different conclusion about this event, but I'm convinced of my thesis and that I have supported it with evidence from my sources.
That doesn’t end the story for me, though. My research and writing made me think of a lot of new questions about what led up to this event.
My conclusions about historical inquiry
My inquiry project made me see that history is not something that is already finished. Every time someone looks at documents and evidence they are "making history" anew. Each person brings their own ideas, experience and interpretation to sources. And each time they do, that person creates a new story out of history.
Teaching and Learning Resources
This page is a sampling of the many resources for you and your students to use to learn more about Universal Design for Learning, the process of historical inquiry and organizing and presenting information. Enjoy!
UDL Resources:
Historical Methodology Resources:
Lessons and Activities:
Primary Source Resources:
Free tools to organize information:
Guides for writing:
Rubrics, Guides and Tools